Assemblage relates to the combining process of creating a remix. Original copies and ideas that are combined to have social effects. The article as a whole is an assemblage of texts and specific views of others dealing with the relationship among plagiarism, Various examples of literature that have been changed or remixed from its original copy by using these big time steps combination and transformation. The article influences you to go out and  remix texts in ways that notify specific readers, issues ad problems. 

Whenever  literature is copied, without being transformed or combined of some nature , that is considered as plagiarism being it was not changed and was everything was the exact same. If you only  copy an idea for the purpose of profit or fail to get permission for it you are also guilty of plagiarism. The difference between the two is that, plagiarism is copying everything from the work and having no changes to it, while remixed things are when you add your own juice and spice to it to make it better. You also use three steps copy, transform and combine. 

 I understood the passage as a whole. I agree and liked seeing the difference between the two being pointed out it really showed you some different things such as the theme of plagiarism and originality all facing assemblage, it is obvious that assemblage would win in this case for sure. But there should be no long drawn between the both because there are many ways they can be used to help improve something or to remix it. No you don't have to steal someone elses work but you can copy and add to it.